![]() |
| The Fruitful City: Helena Moncrieff |
Sunday, February 16, 2020
The Fruitful City
Late last year, my friend Shirin Mandani arranged for me to
participate in a book reading that Heritage Toronto organised at the St.Lawrence Hall on Toronto-themed nonfiction books.
The books and the authors
featured included The Fruitful City by Helena Moncrieff (ECW Press), The Missing Millionaire by Katie Daubs (Penguin Random House), The Flyer Vault: 150 Years of Toronto Concert History by Rob Bowman and Daniel Tate (Dundurn Press).
It was my first visit to the grand St. Lawrence Hall, at one
time the hub of Toronto political, social, and cultural activities. The venue
reminded me of my visits in the 1980s to the annual lectures on Bombay’s
history at the Heras Institute at St. Xavier
College.
On a Saturday afternoon, St. Lawrence Hall seemed forlornly in
its old-world splendour, isolated in a city that has rapidly transformed into a
postmodern metropolis eager to abandon its colonial era shibboleths. Except
for two or maybe three people, the audience was almost entirely Caucasian. But
I suppose that has to do with the composition of the city’s history.
The program was deeply enriching because the three authors and
their works reflected the
vibrancy and the sociocultural diversity that is
Toronto’s strength. I know little about Toronto’s music scene to talk about it
with any degree of confidence, and so, I’ll focus on the other two books that
were discussed that afternoon.
Toronto Star’s Deborah Dundas is a master at talking about
books and talking to authors. Her chat with the three authors brought out the
nuances of the research by the authors.
Katie Daubs’s The Missing Millionaire is about the mysterious
disappearance of Ambrose Small, the owner of the Grand Opera House, in 1919.
Mahrukh is reading the book at present, and will, hopefully, write about it
once she’s done reading.
I found Helena Moncrieff’s premise of her book fascinating.
The Fruitful City is a slim book of the different types of trees that are grown
by homeowners in their backyards. Trees that reveal the homeowners’ past, their
roots in a different land and an attempt – sometimes rather desperate – to replicate
a culture from which they were uprooted.
One of the great losses of urbanisation is the near-total lack
of knowledge about greenery and the foliage that surrounds us. Toronto, with
its ravines, is probably one of the few urban centres in the world, where you
are always close to a forest. Moncrieff digs deep into Canada’s history to
narrate its fascinating horticultural history, the story of its immigrants and
how they imported their trees with them to their adopted homeland.
The book acquired a totally different dimension when I learned
from my friend Pawan Chankotra that
he was planning to grow a neem tree in his backyard. Moncrieff has a number of examples where
immigrants have not only brought trees of their birthplace to Canada, but take
tremendous care of their trees, including providing them artificial heat.
The Fruitful City won the Heritage Toronto Book award for 2019. Here is an excerpt from the book; it’s longish only to
illustrate the depth of the author’s research:
On a 1791
map from the Ontario archives, pale, watery colours of pink, green and yellow
mark off sections of geography, and cartographer Henri Chatelain had covered
the margins in tidy script with lists of fruits and other resources identified
around what we now know as Ontario. He documented apples, pears, plums,
cherries and a variety of nut trees “comme en Europe.” Four berry
species are listed too: strawberries, raspberries, blueberries and currants.
In fact,
more than two hundred small fruits are native to Canada. That might sound like
plenty, but most don’t appear in our pantries. To call them all berries is a
simplification, although that’s what they look like. Blueberries and
gooseberries are “true berries.” The rest fall into the categories of drupes,
like cherries and elderberries; pomes such as saskatoons or serviceberries, as
they are known in the East; and aggregates, like strawberries and raspberries.
They’ve grown here for a long time. Indigenous people used silver
buffalo berries to flavour, as the name suggests, buffalo meat. Saskatoons were
a key ingredient in pemmican. Plenty more of those native fruits are said to be
tart but very good in jellies. You could survive on them if you were lost in
the woods, but most need a lot of sugar to make them truly palatable to today’s
tastes.
The
Huron-Wendat tapped maple trees, harvested berries and grew corn, beans and
squash in small cleanings in what’s now Southern Ontario. The habitat was rich
with wildlife, horticulture, shelter and access to water travel for many
Indigenous societies. A short article in First Nations House magazine
on Toronto’s Indigenous history describes the area as being not unlikely the
Mediterranean, “in that many cultures and peoples met for the purposes of trade
and commerce – dating back thousands of years prior to European contact.”
In the
1790s, Elizabeth Simcoe, wife of the first lieutenant-governor of Upper Canada,
John Graves Simcoe, wrote in her diary about the berries she collected – fox
berries, mountain tea berries and wild gooseberries that, she reported, were
excellent stewed as sauce for salmon. The Mohawks gave her young son Francis a
gift of cranberries, and Francis offered apples in return. At their white pine
cabin on the edge of the Don River, young Francis, whose ailments are well
documented in the diary, was said to be “much better, and busy in planting
currant bushes and peach trees.” The peach tree is long gone, and all that’s
left of the estate is a subway station name, its nomenclature taken from the
cabin aspirationally dubbed in the honour of the son: Castle Frank.”
(For Castle Frank, see this: https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/castle-frank and this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Frank_station)
Friday, January 31, 2020
A Delhi Obsession
![]() |
| MG Vassanji |
In 2012, I had been in Canada
just four years and read Indian newspapers online regularly. I discovered an
interview of MG Vassanji in India’s Mint newspaper when his novel The
Magic of Saida was published. The interview was competent, or so I
thought. It covered all the things that a newspaper reader would want to know
about an author.
I sent the link to Vassanji,
thinking that he would be delighted. I told him that I had posted the link on
social media. He told me to remove the link. He was actually livid.
I asked him why, and said,
“They have labelled me. Would they have called Margaret Atwood a Christian
author? Or Amitav Ghosh a Hindu author? I doubt it; they wouldn’t. Then, why
label me as an Ismaili Muslim.”
I didn't quite understand his
anger then. But over the years, as I have got to know him a bit better, I have
begun to comprehend his irritation over being labelled.
It is impossible to categorise
Vassanji on the basis of faith or nationality because it is impossible to fit
him into a specific ethnic, religious, national silo.
He is like the Indian raita (an
Indian dish of finely chopped cucumber, peppers, mint, etc. in yoghurt, served
with curries). The Indian raita spreads on an Indian thali, freely mixing with
different vegetables and curries in the thali, and in the process, both
acquires their taste and gives its own flavour to them.
Ismaili-Khoja culture is a mix
of both Hindu and Islamic traditions, blending the streams into a fusion of
Sufi/Bhakti. Although today’s generation believes in having a distinct as
opposed to a defused identity, the religious songs of the Ismaili-Khojas called
Ginans reveal the strong syncretic roots of the community.
To help me understand the
unique syncretism that has made him who he is, Vassanji had sent me a review of
a book on Ginans. (Ginanic Travails: Conflicted Knowledge)
Over the years, in many a
heated discussion about the religious tensions in India that we have had,
Vassanji invariably points out the tendency amongst Indians to label people;
even Indian liberals are not above the labelling, he would complain. This labelling
leads to stereotypical understanding and portrayal of the two communities in
general, but especially of the Indian Muslims.
Finally, in 2019, with A Delhi Obsession Vassanji has
published a novel that sensitively depicts the insensitive Indian habit of
identifying and categorizing people on the basis of their religion.
The novel is a love story, an illicit love story between a married Hindu middle class woman in Delhi and a Muslim widower from Toronto, who is uncomfortable every time everyone identifies him as a Muslim.
Early on in the story, when the
newly-in-love couple visit a shrine, the tension over identity is palpable.
When they were outside,
back in the brightness, she turned to him and said, “But you are a Muslim.”
He took a breath, then
replied, “If you say so. But I don’t describe myself by a faith.”
He felt stupid saying that,
but it was the naked truth.
“But you bowed to our gods.”
“Your gods…Well, I paid my
respect to the gods.”
“What are you, then?”
“Do I have to be something?”
“How do people know you,
then?”
“As just another person. A
friend. A neighbour. An author.”
Towards the end, when the Hindu
nationalist rabble rouser Jetha Lal and his brutish acolytes surround Munir at
the club, threatening him, Munir exclaims in despair and anger, “I’m a Canadian. Don’t put
your labels on me.” To
which the uncouth Jetha Lal patiently responds, “Canadian, sir. But you
like Hindu women, I see. Better than Canadian women, no?” He waited. “No doubt.
But you are Muslim, sir. Mlechha. Different.”
(The word Mlechha is italicised
perhaps to emphasize it, not because it is an Indian word).
A Delhi Obsession is an
incisive portrayal of the unbearable intensity of Hindu nationalism that is
rapidly transforming India into an intolerant, bigoted place where fear rules.
Expectedly, the novel ends tragically; illicit love stories often do. But the
end is as unexpected, sudden, brutal as the end of the popular Marathi film Sairat. The end keeps you awake at
night, long after you have read the last page.
I apologise for spoiling the
reading experience of those who haven't yet read the novel, but I was horrified
by the end of the story. In half a page, it brought alive the horror that is
India today.
Labels:
A Delhi Obsession,
MG Vassanji
Monday, January 13, 2020
The Power of Opportunity - Richard Rothman
Long before the present
publishing boom began in India, Richard Rothman, then a bureaucrat with the United
States Government in India, published a collection of short stories that was
breathtakingly original.
Then, being the maverick that he has always been, Richard kicked his comfortable job to launch his own consultancy – in an area nobody would've thought of as a business proposition – Opportunity.
His second book on the subject The Power of Opportunity is being launched in Bombay later in January. In a short, e-mail interview, he talks about his book and ‘Opportunity’.
Richard’s consultancy Open Mind Consultancy has teamed up with the Penguin India team to create a very India-centric roadmap to both individual and business success.
The Power of Opportunity presents
a thorough methodology of thought and action on personal and business
opportunities. It is the first book to attempt to do this since Edward DeBono
published his book Opportunities in 1978.
Why is the book titled The Power of Opportunity?
Because opportunities have
tremendous power to change our lives for the better. They are the seeds from
which all success grows. For example, a couple years ago I met a 20-year-old
entrepreneur, still a boy really, who had dropped out of college to develop an
internet app. This boy, from a very modest background in Bihar, had managed to
raise $20 million from Tiger Global, a major US venture capital firm.
This example highlights two fundamental things that give opportunities tremendous power:
1) all opportunities are free. You can't pay for them even if you want to. There is no “opportunity shop” where you can buy them. That means that opportunities are available to even to penniless boys from Bihar.
2) the best opportunities are like powerful magnets that attract all the resources needed to scale them. Why had Tiger backed him? Was it because of his track record? Obviously not. Tiger was pouring resources into the opportunity, not the entrepreneur.
But resources flow only to the best opportunities, what I call golden opportunities.
Therefore, it is crucial to consciously choose opportunities by using a systematic process, and not rely on luck, as most people do. Unfortunately, most people end up pursuing Nopportunities, which are not opportunities, because they don't use a systematic process to choose them.
This is the second book you have written on opportunity. How is The Power of Opportunity different from Master Opportunity and Make it Big?
My previous book, Master Opportunity and Make it Big, presented the stories of 18 "Opportunity Masters" who had started with nothing and made it big by taking advantage of excellent opportunities. Although all of these people had succeeded, they did not necessarily understand why. In The Power of Opportunity, I present a methodology of thought and action which is based on my experience with the over 2,000 businesses I have consulted with over the past 30 years as both an Opportunity Consultant and Trade Commissioner. Therefore, it is an original theory which I have developed.
You're probably the only Opportunity Consultant in the world, what exactly do you do or can do for corporations and for individuals.
As the first and only Opportunity Consultant in the world, I offer companies a systematic process to uncover, recover and discover opportunities for sustained, profitable growth. How am I different from other management consultants? Most follow the principles of strategy developed by Michael Porter and others, which uses “competitive advantage” as the main filter through which to view opportunities. I’ve found that using competition as a filter can lead to increasing market irrelevance over time. After all, do your competitors buy your products? Are they part of your team? Of course not. I focus instead on providing useful service to stakeholders.
You have worked in India for the last 25 years, in terms of your specialisation (Opportunity) how has the Indian market changed? Are there more tangible opportunities at present then there were in the early years of economic liberalisation.
On a macro level, I firmly believe that India is the greatest land of opportunity in the world today. Half of India’s population are still subsistence farmers, a business model which is fundamentally broken in the modern age. Over the coming decades, they will move to cities and take better opportunities as wage earners and entrepreneurs. Since the demise of the License Raj in 1991, the Indian opportunities landscape has liberalized - but it still has a long way to go. The government has got to focus less on ideology and more on growth through opportunities.
In your sphere of expertise (identifying opportunities) what changes have you noticed in India over the last two decades?
The Indian mindset is gradually shifting from the pre-license raj mode of opportunity through connections, bribery and extortion, toward a modern rules-based system that rewards opportunity based on merit. This migration to the rules of the modern era will take decades, but the trend is in the right direction, and India will benefit from it.
You have published an amazing collection of phantasmagorical short stories and a novel. Why did you abandon writing fiction?
I haven't abandoned fiction. I plan to resurrect and publish my novel eventually. But at this point I'm focused on spreading the mantra of Opportunity.
You may buy the book here (in India): The Power of Opportunity
Kindle edition is available here (in Canada): The Power of Opportunity
Thursday, December 26, 2019
A requiem for Indian secularism?
As
2019 draws to a close and we look back at the events of the past year, reflect
upon the gains and the losses and the lessons learnt, the one issue that is
impossible to ignore is the rapid decline of secularism in India.
The Modi regime, backed by a solid parliamentary majority it got in 2019, has
set into motion changes that have fundamentally altered India by forcibly extinguishing
its secular ethos.
Although,
India proudly claims to be the largest democracy in the world, democracy in
India has largely been confined to the successful holding of elections.
For
democracy to be meaningful, adherence to other sacrosanct
principles of democracy are necessary. These principles include respect for democratic institutions, a
legislature that engages in meaningful debate, independent judiciary, a free and
thriving media that encourages debate and dissent.
Under
the new Modi regime, democratic norms have been severe constricted. Today,
India under Modi has no patience for secular principles and is keen to enforce
aggressive majoritarianism.
Two events
that demonstrated this tendency are:
- The lockdown in Kashmir
- The passage of the Citizenship Amendment Act and the implementation of the National Register of Citizens.
The Modi regime found a semblance of support for its assertive moves in
Kashmir, primarily because many in India believe that the stalemate in Kashmir
needs to be resolved. And if old methods haven’t yielded results in the last
seven decades, new methods must be tried.
However,
the lockdown of the state and its people since August 2019 is unacceptable, and
a gross violation of people’s rights to freedom.
When
the exercise of identifying illegal immigrants was launched in Assam after Modi
was reelected, it raised legitimate concerns because New Delhi now had a
government that swore by majoritarianism, and was not above using the state’s
enormous reach to propagate its exclusivist philosophy of aggressive Hindutva.
Pertinently,
the exercise of implementing the NRC in Assam proved how difficult, if not
impossible, it would be for a large number of people to prove their Indian
citizenship. Nearly two million people (including Hindus) could not prove that they were Indians.
Perhaps
in recognition of the anomaly that the NRC would result in the exclusion of
Hindus, as well, the Modi regime amended the citizenship act to accord
citizenship rights to non-Muslim immigrants from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and
Pakistan.
Modi’s
supporters may claim that the amendment is to help minorities in these
countries emigrate to India. But the fact is that the purpose of both the NRC
and the amended citizenship act is to exclude Muslims.
Amit
Shah, India’s Home Minister and the second-most important minister in the Modi regime openly declared that the citizenship register would be implemented
across India to ferret out illegal immigrants.
“It
is our commitment to implement National Register of Citizens (NRC) across the
country to weed out the infiltrators. First, we will bring the Citizenship
(Amendment) Bill to ensure that eligible refugees get citizenship, and then we
will introduce NRC to throw out the infiltrators. They are termites, they are
eating into the country's resources,” Shah asserted.
He
declared in the Indian Parliament, “Maan ke chaliye, NRC aane wala hai.” (Take
it as a given that the NRC will be introduced across the country).
In
July 2019, when the implementation of the National Citizens Register was
launched in Assam, the following protest poem, “I am a Miya’ written by Hafiz
Ahmed spread like wildfire on the internet.
Write
Down ‘I am a Miya’
Write
Write
Down
I am
a Miya
My
serial number in the NRC is 200543
I
have two children
Another
is coming
Next
summer.
Will
you hate him
As
you hate me?
Write
I am
a Miya
I
turn waste, marshy lands
To
green paddy fields
To
feed you.
I
carry bricks
To
build your buildings
Drive
your car
For
your comfort
Clean
your drain
To
keep you healthy.
I
have always been
In
your service
And
yet
you
are dissatisfied!
Write
down
I am
a Miya,
A
citizen of a democratic, secular, Republic
Without
any rights
My
mother a D voter,
Though
her parents are Indian.
If
you wish kill me, drive me from my village,
Snatch
my green fields
hire
bulldozers
To
roll over me.
Your
bullets
Can
shatter my breast
for
no crime.
Write
I am
a Miya
Of
the Brahamaputra
Your
torture
Has
burnt my body black
Reddened
my eyes with fire.
Beware!
I
have nothing but anger in stock.
Keep
away!
Or
Turn
to Ashes.
Translated
by Shalim M. Hussain
Will
this protest poem be a requiem for India’s secularism?
The
internet informs me that a requiem “is a religious ceremony performed for
the dead. ... The word requiem comes from the opening words of the
Roman Catholic Mass for the Dead, which is spoken or sung in Latin
(requies means “rest”).
In a
nonreligious context the word refers simply to an act of remembrance.”
Some
of the biggest composers of western classical music have composed requiems, and
one of the most memorable compositions is Clint Mansell’s Lux Aeterna for
Darren Aronofsky’s 2000 film Requiem
for a Dream.
(You may listen to it here: Clint Mansell – Lux Aeterna – Requiem for a Dream).
(You may listen to it here: Clint Mansell – Lux Aeterna – Requiem for a Dream).
'I am
a Miya' will be a requiem for Indian secularism if the world allows India’s Modi
regime to continue with its persecution of Indian Muslims.
Watch
the video here:
Labels:
CAA,
Hafiz Ahmed,
I am a Miya,
Kashmir,
NRC,
Requiem for a Dream,
Shalim M. Hussain
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




