- Anand Mahadevan, Author of American Sufi
- Jawaid Danish, Urdu poetry
- Sheniz Janmohamed, Poetry and Spoken word
- Tariq Hameed, Harmonium and Qawwali vocals
- Samer Shahid Khan, Guitar and Vocals
- Ravi Naimpally, Tabla
Showing posts with label Anand Mahadevan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anand Mahadevan. Show all posts
Sunday, December 01, 2013
'My identity depends on who is identifying me (including myself)'
'My identity depends on who is identifying me (including
myself)
Therefore, what is really real about me?
What is inherently
me?
I don’t know.
Maybe nothing.
Maybe everything.'
Interview with Sheniz Janmohamed
In the Sufi Poets
Series of events you have created a unique blend of music, poetry and art. What
inspired you to start the series?
Three things inspired me to start the series:
The work of Rohail Hyatt, the producer of Coke Studio
Pakistan. He is an incredible facilitator of creativity and collaboration and
the pieces he produces are transformative and revolutionary – not just for the
audience, but for the participants as well.
I have a lot of wonderful friends who are talented artists,
writers, poets, musicians, spoken word artists and performers and I always
thought, “What if I introduced this person to that person? I wonder what they
would come up with!” But in order to do that, I had to create a purpose, and a
central theme.
My love for Sufi poetry became that central purpose. I
wanted to see how people who have never heard of Bulleh Shah would
interpret/connect to his work – and witness that process of discovery. It’s
about creating community and provoking creativity. There’s no room for ego.
Everyone is working to revive the poetry of a poet who is remains alive through
their words, their music. It’s about exposing people to Sufi poetry for its
heresy, passion and humanism. And people in the audience feel that energy and
bask in it (I hope!)
What is special about
the forthcoming Sufi Poets Series?
Sufi Poets Series III: American Sufi is a different format
than usual because we’re featuring Anand Mahadevan’s novel of the same title,
not a Sufi poet.
In Mahadevan’s words, “American Sufi weaves in elements of
Sufi storytelling, sub-continental history, and Urdu poetry to reveal the
tragedy of a land and its people rent between their devotion to the pacifist
strain of Sufi Islam and the growing clout of Saudi-funded militancy.”
It is the central focus and arching narrative of the
evening. Mahadevan will narrate sections of this story and the musicians will
support it and respond to it with their voices and instruments. The lyrics and
poetry to be sung/performed hail from Pakistan. We’re trying to recreate the
feeling of being at a dargah (sufi shrine) but also to follow the journey of a
young man who is torn between his life in the West and his sufi calling. It
contexualizes the relevance of the sufi message for the post 9/11 world.
Why did you start
Ignite Poets?
I started Ignite Poets because I wanted to collaborate with
spoken word artists, poets and musicians, not compete with them. When I began
the series, most of the poetry events in the city were either slams or open
mics. I wanted to create a platform for spoken word artists/poets to speak to
each other and with each other through collaboration with performance sets that
flowed seamlessly from one piece to the next. Most of Ignite Poets’ previous
shows have been scripted/organized poem by poem- I spend a lot of time trying
to connect each individual piece with the other so that there is a sense of
cohesion – without taking away from each poet’s voice.
Now about your work –
ghazals and spoken word: Ghazals and spoken word make for a different sort of
combination – while both draw upon personal experiences, the ghazal is a
subtle, elusive, indirect form, the spoken word poetry is direct, often brash,
in-your-face. Creatively speaking, don’t you find the dichotomy daunting?
I don’t find the dichotomy daunting, and sometimes it
doesn’t even feel like a dichotomy.
The spoken word form allows me to be more flexible and
creative in how I play with my words. It relies on the performative quality of
the poetry and how my voice can amplify the message behind the words. In that
sense, spoken word can be ‘direct, often brash, in-your-face’ because of the
nature of the form itself – the rhythm, the inflections of voice, the tone and
the body language.
However, the ghazal form can also be ‘direct, often brash,
in-your-face’ because I’m using a pen name. Using a pen name is liberating
because I’m not hiding behind the persona of “Sheniz” and the ego that comes
along with it. My pen name, Israh, is the inner voice, which is often harsh and
brutally honest. It sometimes forces me to see what I don’t want to see. So
while the form of the ghazal is more structured because there are so many rules
to abide by (internal rhyming, couplets, repeating/rhyming refrains and pen
name), there’s also immense freedom in the content itself. I’m not presenting
myself to an audience, I’m presenting myself to myself.
What is the most
common comment you get about writing ghazals in English?
I can’t really say there is one- it depends on who I’m
speaking to and their knowledge of the form. People who don’t have knowledge of
the form normally ask me what it is and what it entails. People who are very
familiar with the form are often shocked that the form exists in the English
language- some of them assume that I translate existing ghazals, and I have to
clarify that I write original ghazals in English. Then the second
comment/question I get is “Why don’t you write in Urdu?” I don’t speak Urdu, I
don’t write in Urdu. My mother tongue is English and I’m trying to maintain/re-invent
the form in this language. To claim it, in a sense.
Sufism inspires you. Sufism is a way of life; it abjures orthodoxy,
questions convictions, modulates attitudes and ultimately challenges belief.
But it is at variance with the emerging belief systems in a multicultural world
where identity is overtly important, especially when one belongs to a minority
– ethnic, linguistic, religious, gender. Sufism is antithetical to the notion
of identity because it inspires you to lose your identity and become one with
divinity. If you agree, how do you reconcile the two elements as an artist?
Identity, for me, is not static. My identity is constantly
shifting/evolving/developing. It’s not stagnant nor is it independent of the
environment around me. I occupy many labels and identities. Some people refer
to me as South Asian. To someone else, I’m a Canadian. My identity depends on
who is identifying me (including myself). Therefore, what is really real about
me? What is inherently me? I don’t know. Maybe nothing. Maybe everything. Maybe
both.
The artist is constantly interacting with the world around
him/her in some shape or form. To create the same thing over and over again is
artistic death- we’re always looking for something new to inspire and challenge
us. We’re constantly shapeshifting, questioning and re-inventing. Questioning
our relationship to the world is part of the creative process.
At the same
time, in order to truly give myself to what I write or perform, I have to
forget myself. If I start thinking about how I look on stage while I’m
performing, I forget my lines. If I start judging myself while I’m writing a
poem, I’m no longer writing. The art of creating is letting go of this exoteric
notion of identity and embracing the moment the poem unravels, or the words
spill out of my mouth.
SUFI POETS SERIES III: American Sufi
Time: 7pm
Date: December 7th, 2013
Venue: Beit Zatoun House, 612 Markham Street, Toronto
Ticket price: $15.00
The third installation of the popular Sufi Poets Series,
this event will feature musical interpretations, poetic recitations and
narrations of Anand Mahadevan's latest novel, "American Sufi",
inspired by the music and poetry of Pakistan.
The novel weaves in elements of Sufi storytelling,
sub-continental history, and Urdu poetry to reveal the tragedy of a land and
its people rent between their devotion to the pacifist strain of Sufi Islam and
the growing clout of Saudi-funded militancy.
Performers and musical guests:
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Writing is rewriting, review, patience, prayers...
![]() |
This is equally applicable to readers and to writers |
What do writers feel about the process of writing –
generally most writers describe it as a very lonely thing that they do.
Andrew J. Borkowski, whose Copernicus Avenue won the 2012 Toronto Book Award had a contrary view.
In his acceptance speech, he said for him writing wasn’t a lonely process for
him at all.
On his website Borkowski says “writing is rewriting”.
I remember Isabel Huggan telling a group of wannabe writers
the same thing at the summer program at Humber School of Writers.
My friend Farzana Doctor gave me the same mantra when I met
her recently to discuss my manuscript.
Farzana’s second novel – Six
Meters of Pavement – was shortlisted for the award that Borkowski’s Copernicus Avenue finally won.
She also told me to be patient when reworking on the
manuscript.
I recently met Jaspreet Singh, author of Seventeen Tomatoes: Tales from Kashmir,
a collection of short stories and Chef, a novel (and a forthcoming novel Helium) wryly remarked that has a lot of
experience in being patient.
I had gone to his reading a couple of years ago at the North
York Central Library when I was new in Toronto, and nobody knew me, or took me
seriously.
I don’t know too many people even now, and absolutely nobody
takes me seriously as a writer.
But that’s not the subject of this blog post.
It’s about the writing process.
Some writers prefer to keep their writing under wraps and
prefer not showing it to peers.
I’m sure they’re in a small minority. Most writers prefer to
seek peer review and are open to making changes based on feedback.
I’ve got some exceptional feedback to my manuscript from my
friends.
I think peer review is vital.
Also vital is feedback from one’s mentor.
At a lively discussion last week Anand Mahadevan and Kristyn
Dunnion emphasized the importance of seeking peer and mentor review.
Mahadevan narrated his experience (re)writing his first
novel The Strike, based on his mentor
MG Vassanji’s feedback , and how finally when he had worked on the manuscript and
incorporated nearly all the suggestions that his mentor had made, the
manuscript had acquired a reached a completely different realm.
They were at the Impossible Words.
Irfan Ali and Emily Pohl-Weary curate Impossible Words. The
Academy of Impossible website describes Impossible Words thus: “Impossible
Words is a unique literary salon that presents culturally and stylistically
diverse Canadian writers in conversation with young writers from the Toronto
Street Writers. It takes place on the second and fourth Saturdays.”
I’ve attended two sessions so far, and I’ve liked the raw
energy and the in-your-face quality that the young writers from the Toronto
Street Writers bring to these sessions.
So, basically, writing is rewriting, review, patience, and
then I guess prayers. I’m teaching myself the first three, but as an agnostic, it’s
going rather difficult having to pray.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)